It's interesting that the majority health and safety systems blame hazards for accidents within the workplace. They then place the responsibility for handling these hazards on management instead of on the workers. This quite clearly holds the management of the business responsible and accountable for workplace hazards. Nevertheless, hazards by themselves do not cause accidents. It's normally human behavior that is involved during a workplace accident. Therefore how will we tend to select between these contrasting explanations?
One method of handling it is to assume that whenever there is an accident, one or alternative of those factors can be a lot of vital in terms of the cause. When numbers of accidents have been analyzed, the statistics show that in the majority of cases it's the behavior of the worker that causes the injury. This can be secured out of the blue investigations we have a tendency to're a terribly common comment from the victim is that, "I ought to have been a lot of careful." It has been reported that 85% of accidents are because of "lack of training or education, poor work habits or lack of motivation." If this is the case, then the remainder of the accidents are the results of management failures, system failures or unsafe conditions.
Unfortunately, this can be not a satisfactory method to resolve the issue. Laying the blame for 85% on the employee, fails to acknowledge that unsafe behavior may be the results of systemic causes. It may be that organizational procedures are at fault rather than simply the worker behavior.
When there is an accident there is normally a contribution from each the victim and the system. However, there seems to be in need to stress one or other of those factors so that policies can be designed to safeguard the worker against harm. It appears that the alternatives facing the policy writers, directs them to emphasize the system factors before the people factors. The reason for this is that changing systems and then imposing them, can often be a additional effective and reliable manner of preventing injuries instead of making an attempt to vary employee behavior. The opposite element is that it's easier to jot down policy than it's modify the behavior of individuals in groups.
Writing policy is more reliable because it gets to change the preconditions that enable incidents and injuries to occur. Furthermore, it is more effective as a protection live as a result of it does not depend on people in general doing the right thing. Emphasizing management responsibility provides the most effective chance of safer workplaces in general. But there is a problem. There's an inclination for the management accountable human error and human behavior as a result of it's a abundant cheaper strategy because it eliminates the need to form expensive changes to systems. This results in a conflict of interests in effective injury prevention in the workplace and is the reason for continued failure to supply safer working conditions.
Author Resource:-
Bob has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in workplace safety,you can also check out his latest website about:
60 Gallon Aquarium which reviews and lists the best
Used Aquarium
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://www.healthandwealth4you.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites
